Universities’ financial performance in 2019 - Office of the Auditor General (2024)

Reporting changes adopted in 2019

Universities applied the new and revised accounting standards of the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) from the application date of 1 January 2019 for public sector entities and other not-for-profit entities.

The universities elected to apply the modified retrospective option in the standards for their transition. The benefit of using this approach was comparative figures for prior years did not need to be restated, therefore reducing the amount of work required. A detailed note to the financial statements discloses the impact of these changes in accounting treatment from 1January 2019.

Reporting of leases – AASB 16

The key change of AASB 16 is that the majority of operating leases, which were previously recorded off-balance sheet, are now required to be capitalised on the balance sheet (Statement of Financial Position). Accordingly property, motor vehicle and equipment leases are now accounted for as right-of-use assets and their associated lease liability.

Using this approach, from initial application of AASB 16 on 1 January 2019, universities recognised right of use assets and the lease liability.

Reporting of revenue and income under AASB 15 and AASB 1058

From 1 January 2019, revenue from contracts (AASB 15), such as grant money received with performance obligations, is reported by allocating the grant money to each performance obligation and recognising the revenue as or when the obligations are satisfied. Similarly, grant money received with an obligation to acquire or construct an asset that will be retained by the entity (i.e. a capital grant under AASB 1058) is recognised as or when the obligation to acquire or construct the asset is satisfied. This means a grant received for the construction of an asset is recognised as revenue in stages during the construction. The full value of the grant is recognised by the time the constructed asset is put into operation. Prior to introduction of the new standards, this practice of deferring revenue recognition was common in the private sector but not for not-for-profit public sector entities.

Under AASB 1058, transactions relating to assets acquired at significantly less than fair value also have new recognition principles.

The implementation of these standards by the universities resulted in adjustments of opening equity and recognition of deferred revenue.

Selected significant financial transactions

Details of significant 2019 financial transactions that we noted during our audits are listed below. Most of this information is reported in each university’s annual report, and we have included them here for the convenience of Parliament. By reporting these items, we are not implying that we have any residual concern with these transactions.

Assets

  • Curtin commenced construction of the $300 million Greater Curtin project, named ‘Exchange’, during 2019 – a new precinct with student accommodation, hotel, retail, commercial and car parking space. As part of this arrangement, Curtin early-adopted AASB 1059: Service Concession Arrangements. The current year treatment resulted in the recognition of $39 million of service concession assets and a corresponding liability. This reflects Curtin granting the operator of Exchange, the right to operate existing and to construct and operate new accommodation.
  • UWA’s property plant and equipment increased by $30 million for the year due to additional capital investment for EZone, a new student hub for Engineering and Mathematical Sciences. Ezone started in 2018 and is expected to be completed in early 2020, as it was estimated to be 90% completed at 31 December 2019.
  • ECU’s property, plant and equipment increased from $806 million in 2018 to $847million in 2019 largely due to $39 million capital spending on the Joondalup biosciences research and teaching laboratories.
  • Each universities’ investment in Education Australia Limited increased from $22.9million in 2018 to $39.7 million in 2019 following the most recent independent fair value assessment conducted in 2019.

Liabilities

  • On 11 April 2019, ECU issued $120 million of AUD fixed rate medium term notes with a 3% per annum coupon rate and a settlement date of 11 April 2029. This notes issue is recorded by ECU as part of their long term financial plan to fund strategic goals.

Revenue

  • Murdoch’s fees and charges income increased by $27.6 million (28.8%) to $123.4million. Murdoch attributes this to the increase in overseas fee paying onshore students from their ongoing international welcome scholarship and increased marketing efforts.

Expenditure

  • UWA’s employee related expenses increased by $14 million to $541 million partly due to an increase in FTE, a 2% wage increase, and the additional long service leave expense resulting from reassessment after clarification of leave requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009.

KPIs

  • UWA reported 13 KPIs for 2019, of which 7 were new and 5 were prepared using revised methodologies. Preparing and auditing the new datasets and amended methodologies of these KPIs was a significant task for UWA staff and our auditors.

Key financial ratios of universities

The Australian Government Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE) uses a number of benchmark indicators to assess the financial performance of universities. These measures include liquidity, diversity of revenue, dependence on international student fees, operating result and borrowings to equity ratio.

We have used each university’s audited financial statements[1] to show performance against these indicators for the 5 years ending 31 December 2019. Table 4 summarises the risk ratings inferred by these indicators.

2019 – Summary of universities’ ratios
Liquidity / current ratio2 universities rated as low risk, 1 as medium and 1 as high risk
Diversity of revenue2 universities rated as low risk and 2 as medium risk
Operating resultsAll 4 universities reported a surplus
Borrowings to equity ratio3 universities rated as low risk and 1 as high risk
Dependence on international students3 universities rated as medium risk and 1 as low risk

Table 4: University financial risk inferred by selected 2019 financial performance ratios Source: OAG calculated from audited annual financial statements using DESE benchmarks

Note: These ratings are based on criteria set by the Australian Government DESE

Liquidity / current ratio

The liquidity or current ratio assesses an entity’s ability to meet their debts as and when they fall due. The traditional accounting formula is current assets divided by current liabilities.

DESE considers a ratio of more than 1 low risk and below 0.75 high risk. Based on this rating, ECU and Murdoch were low risk, Curtin was medium risk and UWA high risk, when assessed on this indicator for 2019.

As the liquidity ratio recognises current assets only, we have also shown in Table 6, details of the universities’ total current and non-current cash and other financial assets for each year. Each university’s liquidity ratio would improve if their non-current liquid assets were included in the calculation.

Diversity of revenue – dependence on Australian Government funding

Universities can reduce their financial risk by diversifying their revenue sources. Each university has a different capacity to generate revenue, depending on factors such as location, size, courses offered, extent of research activity, perceived standing and student profiles.

For its 2019 benchmarking DESE considered universities with 55% or less of revenue received from Australian Government funding low risk and between 55% and 65% medium risk. Australian Government financial assistance includes Commonwealth Grant Scheme and other grants, HECS-HELP and FEE-HELP payments. For 2019, Murdoch and UWA rated as low risk while Curtin and ECU were a medium risk for this indicator.

Operating result

Universities are not-for-profit organisations but their operating result is a useful measure of financial performance. Large deficits or a trend of consecutive deficits indicates a need for review and analysis.

All universities reported a surplus for 2019.

Borrowings to equity ratio

Legislation permits universities to finance their activities by borrowing. DESE considers universities with 7% or less of their equity represented by borrowings to be low risk. Greater than 10% rates as high risk.

Curtin, Murdoch and UWA remain low risk, while ECU is high risk on this indicator.

Dependence on overseas student fees

Universities can diversify their revenue sources by encouraging overseas students to study their courses. However, the general view is that universities should not be overly dependent on this source of income.

For its 2019 benchmarking DESE considered universities with 15% or less of operating revenue from fee-paying overseas students low risk and between 15% and 25% medium risk. Based on these criteria, 3 universities rate as medium risk and UWA as low risk for this indicator.

Equivalent Full Time Student Load for universities

Universities measure their student enrolments as Equivalent Full Time Student Load (EFTSL). As this information is released by the DESE in September of the following year, the 2019 student enrolment information is not yet available.

The following table shows the EFTSL for the universities from 2015 to 2018, and the percentage of these enrolments relating to international students. ECU’s EFTSL has increased each year, as has their proportion of international students. Curtin and UWA had an overall decreasing trend in their EFTSL with Curtin’s proportion of international students also decreasing while UWA’s proportion of international students increased.

[1] Financial ratios are calculated using the university figures, not their consolidated results.

Universities’ financial performance in 2019 - Office of the Auditor General (2024)

FAQs

Universities’ financial performance in 2019 - Office of the Auditor General? ›

Universities are not-for-profit organisations but their operating result is a useful measure of financial performance. Large deficits or a trend of consecutive deficits indicates a need for review and analysis. All universities reported a surplus for 2019.

What is a good current ratio for a university? ›

This simple calculation matches the institution's short-term assets with liabilities expected to come due during the same period. Generally accepted standards for this ratio indicate a 2:1 coverage as being desirable. The numerator is total current assets; the denominator is total current liabilities.

What do liquidity ratios measure? ›

Liquidity ratios are a measure of the ability of a company to pay off its short-term liabilities. Liquidity ratios determine how quickly a company can convert the assets and use them for meeting the dues that arise. The higher the ratio, the easier is the ability to clear the debts and avoid defaulting on payments.

Is a high current ratio good? ›

In theory, the higher the current ratio, the more capable a company is of paying its obligations because it has a larger proportion of short-term asset value relative to the value of its short-term liabilities.

What does current ratio measure? ›

Current ratio is a measure of a company's liquidity, or its ability to pay its short-term obligations using its current assets. It's also a useful ratio for keeping tabs on an organization's overall financial health.

How to tell if current ratio is good or bad? ›

In general, a current ratio between 1.5 and 3 is considered healthy. Ratios lower than 1 usually indicate liquidity issues, while ratios over 3 can signal poor management of working capital.

What is an acceptable financial ratio? ›

A ratio of 1 or greater is considered acceptable for most businesses. Indicates a company's ability to pay immediate creditor demands, using its most liquid assets.

What is considered a good liquidity ratio? ›

Generally, a good Liquidity Ratio should be above 1.0. This indicates the company has enough current assets to cover its short-term liabilities.

What is the most popular liquidity ratio? ›

A ratio of 1 is better than a ratio of less than 1, but it isn't ideal. Creditors and investors like to see higher liquidity ratios, such as 2 or 3. The higher the ratio is, the more likely a company is able to pay its short-term bills.

What is the liquidity ratio in financial performance? ›

Liquidity ratios are an important class of financial metrics used to determine a debtor's ability to pay off current debt obligations without raising external capital. Common liquidity ratios include the quick ratio, current ratio, and days sales outstanding.

What is a bad current ratio? ›

A current ratio below 1.0 suggests that a company's liabilities due in a year or less are greater than its assets. A low current ratio could indicate that the company may struggle to meet its short-term obligations.

What is a too high current ratio? ›

A high ratio (greater than 2.0) indicates excessive current assets in the form of inventory, and underemployed capital. A low ratio (less than 1.0) indicates difficulty to meet short-term financial obligations, and the inability to take advantage of opportunities requiring quick cash.

Is too high of a current ratio bad? ›

If the company's current ratio is too high it may indicate that the company is not efficiently using its current assets or its short-term financing facilities. If current liabilities exceed current assets the current ratio will be less than 1.

What is a good return on assets? ›

A ROA of over 5% is generally considered good and over 20% excellent. However, ROAs should always be compared amongst firms in the same sector. For instance, a software maker has far fewer assets on the balance sheet than a car maker.

What is a good debt-equity ratio? ›

The optimal D/E ratio varies by industry, but it should not be above a level of 2.0. A D/E ratio of 2 indicates the company derives two-thirds of its capital financing from debt and one-third from shareholder equity.

What is a good debt to total assets ratio? ›

In general, a ratio around 0.3 to 0.6 is where many investors will feel comfortable, though a company's specific situation may yield different results.

Is a 1.75% current ratio good? ›

The current ratio weighs a company's current assets against its current liabilities. A good current ratio is typically considered to be anywhere between 1.5 and 3.

Is 2.5 a good current ratio? ›

The current ratio for Company ABC is 2.5, which means that it has 2.5 times its liabilities in assets and can currently meet its financial obligations Any current ratio over 2 is considered 'good' by most accounts.

Is 12 a good current ratio? ›

The higher the ratio is, the more capable you are of paying off your debts. If your current ratio is low, it means you will have a difficult time paying your immediate debts and liabilities. In general, a current ratio of 2 or higher is considered good, and anything lower than 2 is a cause for concern.

What is a good current ratio for government? ›

The financial dimension of liquidity is a local government's ability to address short-term obligations. The quick ratio is used to analyze this dimension, where cash and investments are divided by current liabilities. The industry standard for this ratio is often cited at 2.0 or higher.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Msgr. Benton Quitzon

Last Updated:

Views: 6151

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (63 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Msgr. Benton Quitzon

Birthday: 2001-08-13

Address: 96487 Kris Cliff, Teresiafurt, WI 95201

Phone: +9418513585781

Job: Senior Designer

Hobby: Calligraphy, Rowing, Vacation, Geocaching, Web surfing, Electronics, Electronics

Introduction: My name is Msgr. Benton Quitzon, I am a comfortable, charming, thankful, happy, adventurous, handsome, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.