What risks should you consider when using robo-advisory tools for wealth management? (2024)

One of the risks of using robo-advisors is that they may be biased by the data and assumptions they use to make decisions. For example, robo-advisors may rely on historical data that does not reflect current or future market conditions, or they may use oversimplified or inaccurate models that do not capture the complexity and diversity of the financial world. Moreover, robo-advisors may not account for your personal circ*mstances, such as your tax situation, your liquidity needs, or your ethical values. Therefore, you should always review and understand the logic and inputs behind the robo-advisor's recommendations and adjust them if necessary.

Another risk of using robo-advisors is that they may be vulnerable to cyberattacks that compromise your data and assets. Robo-advisors store and process large amounts of sensitive information, such as your identity, bank accounts, portfolio holdings, and transactions. If hackers gain access to this data, they may use it to steal your money, identity, or information. They may also manipulate or sabotage the robo-advisor's algorithms to cause losses or damage. Therefore, you should always check the security and privacy policies of the robo-advisor platform and use strong passwords and encryption methods to protect your data.

A third risk of using robo-advisors is that they may be affected by human error or negligence. Robo-advisors are not completely autonomous; they still depend on human intervention and supervision to operate and improve. For example, robo-advisors may need human input to update their algorithms, to fix bugs or glitches, or to handle customer complaints or queries. However, humans can make mistakes or oversights that affect the performance and reliability of the robo-advisor. Therefore, you should always monitor and evaluate the robo-advisor's results and feedback and report any issues or concerns to the provider.

A fourth risk of using robo-advisors is that they may face regulatory uncertainty or challenges. Robo-advisors are relatively new and innovative in the financial industry, and they may not fit well with the existing legal and regulatory frameworks. For example, robo-advisors may raise questions about their fiduciary duty, their accountability, their transparency, their compliance, or their liability. Moreover, different jurisdictions may have different rules and standards for robo-advisors, which may create confusion or inconsistency for cross-border investors. Therefore, you should always research and understand the regulatory environment and risks of the robo-advisor platform and jurisdiction you choose.

A fifth risk of using robo-advisors is that they may lack emotional attachment or empathy with your goals and preferences. Robo-advisors are based on logic and mathematics, and they do not have feelings or emotions that influence their decisions. However, investing is not only a rational but also an emotional activity, and you may have emotional reactions or attachments to your investments. For example, you may feel anxious or excited about market fluctuations, or you may have sentimental or ethical reasons to invest in certain assets or sectors. Therefore, you should always balance your emotions and rationality when using robo-advisors and not lose sight of your personal values and objectives.

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Investment Banking

+ Follow

Thanks for your feedback

Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.