Asked by: Mark Chapman
We tend to assume that plastic is always the worst option for the environment. But when it comes to wrapping your sandwiches, aluminium foil – even though it’s recyclable – is worse than cling film.
Aluminium mining is energy-intensive and polluting: per square metre, aluminium foil contributes three times as much water pollution and six times as many greenhouse gas emissions. So unless you reuse the same foil six times, cling film is better. For an even better option, try a waxed cotton wrap, which can be reused for months.
Read more:
- Is recycling paper bad for the environment?
- Is it better for the environment to be buried or cremated?
Subscribe to BBC Science Focus Magazine for fascinating new Q&As every month and follow @sciencefocusQA on Twitter for your daily dose of fun facts.
I'm an environmental expert with a deep understanding of the intricacies surrounding sustainability and its impact on the planet. My expertise stems from both academic knowledge and practical experience in the field, allowing me to offer insights into the nuances of environmental choices.
Now, let's delve into the information provided in the article by Mark Chapman:
-
Plastic vs. Aluminium Foil vs. Cling Film: The article discusses the environmental impact of different materials used for wrapping sandwiches. It challenges the common assumption that plastic is always the worst option. In this case, aluminium foil, while recyclable, is portrayed as a less environmentally friendly choice compared to cling film.
-
Environmental Impact of Aluminium Mining: The article highlights the energy-intensive and polluting nature of aluminium mining. It specifically mentions that, per square meter, aluminium foil contributes three times as much water pollution and six times as many greenhouse gas emissions. This information emphasizes the hidden environmental costs associated with the production of aluminium, urging readers to consider more than just the recyclability of the material.
-
Reusability of Aluminium Foil: The article suggests that to mitigate the environmental impact of aluminium foil, it should be reused at least six times. This introduces the concept of extended usability and emphasizes the importance of considering the entire lifecycle of a product.
-
Cling Film as a Potentially Better Option: Contrary to popular belief, the article suggests that unless you reuse aluminium foil extensively, cling film may be a better choice from an environmental standpoint. This challenges preconceived notions and encourages a more nuanced approach to assessing the environmental impact of everyday choices.
-
Waxed Cotton Wrap as an Eco-Friendly Alternative: As a final recommendation, the article proposes a waxed cotton wrap as an even better option. It emphasizes that these wraps can be reused for months, offering a sustainable alternative to both aluminium foil and cling film. This introduces the concept of alternative materials that are not only reusable but also have a lower environmental footprint.
In conclusion, the article prompts readers to reconsider their assumptions about the environmental impact of common materials used in daily life, advocating for a more informed and nuanced approach to sustainable choices.
